Governor Ho Chul vetoed the bill just before Christmas. She hadn’t vetoed the bill all year until she won her re-election. But since early November, she has vetoed more than 50 of her bills.according to new york postGov. Ho-chol is saving money for her priorities, including building more affordable housing, reforming juvenile detention centers, and supporting group homes for people with developmental disabilities who were hit hard in 2018. At the same time, they were keen to reject bills that cost the state money. Pandemic.
Supporting Claim: Supplement Use Worsens Eating Disorders
Among the bills that were rejected was a bill titled New York Legislative Bill A431-C. The bill would restrict the sale of muscle-building and weight-loss supplements to minors, require brick-and-mortar retailers to put such products behind counters, and require purchasers to present ID to prove their age. request to provide
The motivation for this bill, and other similar bills, including one that California Governor Gavin Newsom rejected in the fall, is the alleged link between the use of such products and worsening eating disorders. There is
Opponents of the bills in California and New York, and similar bills still pending in New Jersey, say there is no evidence that supplement use is linked in any way to worsening eating disorders. People who suffer from eating disorders may actually be using nutritional supplements, but there’s nothing to suggest causality there, advocates say.
It’s not clear at this time the exact reason why Gov. Ho-Chol rejected the bill, but Dr. Danfabricant, head of the Natural Products Association, said her reasons were similar to what Gov. Newsom expressed when she spoke. He said he had the impression that his state veto.
“I think this was similar to the concern that Governor Newsom had: the state was not ready to do this.”the fabricant said NutraIngredients-USA.
Among the potential problems was a problem of definition. The bill would have required state health departments to begin determining, on a case-by-case basis, which products on the market should be subject to restrictions.
“And all this would be done without any real science to start taking things off the shelves.” The fabricant said.
CRN: Bill would have cost the industry if he didn’t help eating disorder sufferers
Steve Mister, president and CEO of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, said while CRN is empathetic to people suffering from eating disorders, New York and other states are focusing on proven ways to help them. It should be hit and should not disappear down the regulatory rabbit hole.
“Government Ho-chul said that while the proposals passed through the legislature are well-intentioned, they are unlikely to have much impact on the public health problem of rising eating disorders and body dysmorphic disorders among young adults. I am pleased to recognize that it would place an unfair burden on retailers, which is difficult for them to meet, but products sold online, often attracting young people with aggressive claims. has little effect on theHe said.
“We will consult with Governor Ho-Chol’s staff to provide scientific information on the safety and existing federal regulations of the affected products, as well as information on the significant economic contributions that dietary supplement manufacturing and ingredient distribution will bring to New York. We thank the Governor for listening to these objections and rejecting the bill.”Added mister.
NPA: No Adverse Event Data to Support Harm Claims
Fabricant said one of the arguments the NPA has put forward in both California and New York centers on existing adverse event reporting systems. If there really is a problem with the alleged link between supplements and eating disorders, there will at least be some signal in the system.
“That system works. These are the actual data points that clinicians use. It does a very good job of removing the indicated products.”He said.
.
