In particular, CIA employees and contractors expressed concern. The judge added that the “speculative situation” had never been implemented by the CIA’s collaborative screening policy during work.
The Biden administration’s challenge to federal vaccine obligations arose in courts across the country. Other federal courts have issued national injunctions or injunctions targeting specific states, and government vaccine rules are largely pending while proceedings continue. ..
According to experts, Brinkema’s decision is important because it covers the requirements of coronavirus testing, not the obligation to vaccinate employees of some of the country’s leading law enforcement and national security agencies.
“Who is more important than the FBI or CIA?” Peter Myers, an emeritus professor of law at George Washington University Law School and former director of the school’s Vaccine Proceedings Clinic, said several courts vaccinated. He added that he was considering vaccination obligations but was unaware of the injunction covering the testing obligations.
Brinkema filed a proceeding for procedural reasons, but also commented from the bench to address the benefits of the proceedings.
“This is an effort by the agencies involved to keep the workforce safe,” Brinkema said.
The Supreme Court previously ruled that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration cannot impose a national vaccine obligation on all businesses with more than 100 employees. However, the High Court has also ruled that hospitals and medical facilities funded by Medicaid or Medicare may be subject to vaccination obligations.
Against that “misleading” background, Myers said Brinkema’s ruling was “very important.”
“It’s not a benefit, but it’s a very important decision because we’re dealing with very important institutions, and individuals within those institutions that challenge these vaccines and testing obligations. The courts here are these. I’m saying I can’t challenge my policy, “Myers said.
Employees of the FBI, the CIA, the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, and the Department of Defense Education Headquarters, the agency that runs schools for military children, were sued in April with CIA contractors. They were allowed to use the pseudonyms “John Doe” and “Jane Doe” in court documents.
Twenty-five plaintiff lawyers have claimed that “people who remain unvaccinated are malicious” by the Biden administration since the federal vaccine obligations began to come into force in 2021, and scientific data “vaccines.” Unvaccinated is not the cause of COVID-19 infection. “
Brinkema said the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that the coronavirus pandemic poses a “serious health threat.” Judges have so far referred to “economic tailspin” and more than one million deaths in the United States.
She added that the vaccine “certainly reduces the risk of infection” and that being tested once a week is a “minimal invasion”. Anyone who filed the proceedings said, “I have never taken any employment action against them.”
After the hearing, plaintiff’s lawyer, Carol A. Thompson, said employees would try to appeal Brinkema’s decision to the US Court of Appeals.
A spokesperson for the Justice Ministry declined to comment.
“The COVID-19 pandemic represents the most serious public health crisis of at least a century,” a lawyer from the Justice Department said in a court submission last month to a joint mitigation policy between federal law enforcement agencies and state security agencies. Defended. “More than 4.7 million Americans have been hospitalized, more than 1 million have died, and tens of thousands of new infections are reported daily in the United States.”
A lawyer at the Department of Justice added that regular testing of unvaccinated people is a “key element of a hierarchical approach to prevent infection” in covid-19, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. rice field.
In filing a similar proceeding, the Judges of the Fourth Circuit said in April that the Pentagon and Food and Drug Administration employees who challenged the Byden administration’s vaccination obligations were at work under the Civil Service Reform Act. I have ruled that I must file a complaint.
Brinkema said it was “very clear” that the ruling would also apply to the case dismissed Thursday.
