Although Medicare’s long-term care coverage is very limited, Medicaid generally requires people to poverty themselves before picking up tabs.
Mascot / Getty Images
Hide captions
Switch captions
Mascot / Getty Images
Although Medicare’s long-term care coverage is very limited, Medicaid generally requires people to poverty themselves before picking up tabs.
Mascot / Getty Images
Patricia Keys, 71, and a stroke survivor need to help with many routine activities such as changing clothes and bathing. Her daughter, Christina, who lives near her mother in Vancouver, Washington, takes care of her at night and pays about $ 3,000 a month for help from other caregivers.
Christina Keys, 53, was excited three years ago when Washington passed the country’s first law to create long-term care benefits for residents who paid for state funds. She wanted it to be a resource for other people facing similar challenges.
According to Keys, this benefit of a lifetime limit of $ 36,500 made a big difference in the first year after a mother’s stroke. Her mom had to build a slope, make other modifications to her house, and provide a wheelchair and hospital bed. The extra money may also have made it easier for Key to hire a caregiver. Instead, she gave up the job of selling technology to take care of her mother.
“People are under this cloud of delusions between your insurance and your retirement [income] “You will be fine,” she said. “They don’t understand everything insurance doesn’t cover.”
But the relief of the Washington family has to wait. The WA Care Fund, which was set up in January to impose mandatory payroll taxes on workers and start collecting money for the program, was postponed while lawmakers were making adjustments during the current legislative session. I did. Payroll deductions will begin in July 2023 and benefits will be available in July 2026.
Other states are closely watching Washington while considering providing compensation to their resident. According to the National Assembly of Parliamentarians, the Task Force is considering how to design and implement long-term care programs in California. According to the NCSL, Illinois and Michigan are also studying this issue.
Christina Keys (left) takes care of her mother, Patricia Keys, who suffered a stroke a few years ago, and pays about $ 3,000 a month for help from other caregivers. “People are under this cloud of delusions between your insurance and your retirement [income] You will be fine, “she says.
Christina Key
Hide captions
Switch captions
Christina Key
Christina Keys (left) takes care of her mother, Patricia Keys, who suffered a stroke a few years ago, and pays about $ 3,000 a month for help from other caregivers. “People are under this cloud of delusions between your insurance and your retirement [income] You will be fine, “she says.
Christina Key
Proponents of the Washington program say fine-tuning is needed and note that social programs such as Medicare and the Affordable Care Act have also been fine-tuned. However, the long-term solvency of the program is questionable, and the cost of workers participating in the program is questioned.
There is no doubt that it is very important to address the needs of long-term care. About 70% of people aged 65 need some kind of nursing care service, many need temporary assistance such as home assistants, while others cost more than $ 90,000 on average. You may face a stay in a nursing home. Year. However, many do not have a good option to cover the cost. Although the scope of Medicare is very limited, Medicaid generally requires people to make themselves poor before picking up a tab. Private long-term care insurance is not affordable for most people.
Conclusion: Many people rely on unpaid families to help with their daily activities such as medical care, bathing and changing clothes.
The problem is getting worse. The number of people over the age of 85 is projected to double within the next 20 years, and the number of Americans with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia is projected to double as well to 13 million. ..
The Federal Community Living Assistance Services and Supports Act (CLASS Act), which is part of the AffordableCareAct, created a voluntary long-term care buy-in program, but was not implemented due to concerns about financial health. .. Since then, Washington, DC policymakers have had little willingness to tackle this issue.
Bonnie Burns, a California Health Advocate consultant and Washington-appointed long-term care expert, said: A state committee that supports the development of supplemental long-term care insurance products offered with state benefits.
The biggest benefit of the Washington program is to cover a year’s worth of home care 20 hours a week, said program director Benjamin Begte.
Wealthy people can afford to take care of them, and the poorest families are eligible for Medicaid, but middle-class families may quickly run out of their savings in an attempt to cover such claims. ..
“It doesn’t solve all the problems, but with the right premiums and the right profits, it alleviates the problems for the family,” Begte said. He added that some families may be given time to “may be able to plan” their long-term care needs after the end of the benefit period.
The law was passed in 2019, but remained under the radar of many people until a compulsory payroll deduction approached. Workers faced a tax of 0.58% per $ 100 of income. The state estimates that for someone who earns $ 52,000 a year, the deduction will be $ 302 a year. People realized they had to start paying for the program, so some pushed back.
Workers could be exempt if they had private long-term care insurance, and by the opt-out deadline of November 1, 2021, thousands of people had fought for compensation. Many state employers immediately offered workers the opportunity to purchase private plans.
Withholding of benefits is not restricted based on income, so wealthy people may want to take out private long-term care insurance if they can pass the medical evaluation of the insurance company.
Gary Brooks, a certified financial planner and co-owner of BHJ Wealth Advisor in Gig Harbor, Washington, said:
By last month, 473,000 workers had received a one-time offer to opt out of the program.
Others argued that they had to pay for the system but couldn’t make a profit. These include people who work in Washington but live in neighboring states, spouses of military personnel who are unlikely to make Washington a permanent home, and will retire three years before they need to receive benefits. People, including temporary visa workers. The committee overseeing the long-term care program estimates that the number of people in these groups eligible to opt out is approximately 264,000.
In January, Governor Jay Inslee signed a law addressing many of these issues. This allows certain groups to opt out and receive partial benefits based on the number of years the near-retired people have paid for the program.
The other group, the group that will retire elsewhere, has not been addressed, but the state is making recommendations for Congress, Begte said. Of the total 3.6 million people, 3.1 million workers are expected to start paying for the program next year, according to current actuarial forecasts, Veghte said.
Some critics are concerned that allowing more people to opt out of the program will put the program on an increasingly volatile financial base.
“The problem of solvency is getting bigger,” said Richard Birmingham, a partner at Seattle’s Davis Light Tremaine, in a class action alleging that it violates federal and state laws governing employee benefits plans. Said on behalf of employers and workers. “The changes they make add to the cost.”
KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national news room that produces detailed journalism on health issues. This is an editorial independent operating program. KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation).
